We cannot solve the STEM gender gap without solving it for millennials. They're our first digital natives, and they're willing to learn quickly.

It can be very challenging to be what you can't see. Think about it in the physical world. You walk into a room, and no one looks like you. Can you relate to them? Do you feel welcome? Let's stop talking about how men dominate the technology industry and instead focus on the women who are killing it.

Power is the agency to effect change, pure and simple. The more power you have, the clearer and less frictional the trajectory from an idea in your mind to its birth in real life.

I live my life as an entrepreneur in every possible way I can by applying the question 'What can be done better and how?' at every juncture.

From a professional standpoint, our transformation of the labor landscape at scale through technology with Levo is the highest and best direction of my energy.

We are very committed to highlighting women succeeding in entrepreneurship or technology.

The fact that millennials are fast at communication and expect transparency and don't feel comfortable with hierarchy gets interpreted as us being impatient or entitled. These traits are perfectly normal given that we're the first digital natives.

I want every single millennial woman to feel like Levo has improved their lives.

An interview is about mutual selection.

The failures that you beat yourself up over are the ones where you experienced warning signs and can connect the dots backwards after the fact.

As an entrepreneur, the latitude of failure and of success is directly correlated to people. I am growing more and more attentive to my first instincts, even if I can't justify them, as they apply to people.

A lot of the magic that is behind success can be unlocked through mentorships. Mentorships are a fundamental part of the success equation.

There's nothing worse for a mentor than being asked generic questions that anyone could answer. They want to ensure that their time is having an impact on you.

We have lived with deadly levels of air pollution for years, which have made us more vulnerable to coronavirus.

I accept that as an elected politician I have a number of other tools that I can use to bring about change but I would also say that the Green party remains committed to appropriate non-violent direct action and I think it is a tool in some cases that is legitimate.

Britain was once notorious as the 'dirty man of Europe' with polluted air, raw sewage pumped into the sea and protected sites being lost at a terrifying rate. E.U. laws and the threat of fines changed much of that.

With the huge benefits of investing in renewables, energy efficiency and demand reduction becoming ever more obvious, it's clear that there needs to be far greater scrutiny of the policy decisions that are propelling Britain towards a nuclear future.

Unquestionably, major transformation of the way the U.K. generates its heat and power is essential.

The creation of regional mayors has done little to reduce the sense that all power is concentrated in Westminster, and all investment in London.

I am a longstanding critic of British foreign policy - and an opponent of the authoritarian, quasi-imperialist, racist, homophobic politics of Putin.

I don't think anybody voted for the Green Party without knowing what our position was on Brexit.

Britain is a parliamentary democracy. Power rests in Parliament, in the House of Commons, and the government - the executive - has to seek the consent of MPs for its legislation.

We cannot afford to burn the vast majority of known fossil fuel reserves.

We must have the right to name our fears and laugh at those who seek to scare us - or risk giving in to terrorists.

Our railways maintain a healthy economy and society. They keep businesses running and families close. They're a vital public service and must be treated as such.

The Green Party is full of motivated, driven people who want to make change happen as fast as possible.

GDP simply measures the circulation of money in the economy, not whether or not the outcome of using that money is positive or negative.

Violence against women is not inevitable.

In a fair society, the solution to unemployment is not to force people into workfare programmes which do little more than supply big companies with free labour. It's to create jobs that pay a living wage, for example, by investing in new sustainable infrastructure projects and boosting the jobs-rich low carbon economy.

When it comes to topping the 'least popular' lists, MPs have form. Typically, we're pipped to the post only by bankers and traffic wardens.

Westminster's hardly a billboard for people-centred politics. Given its makeup, the term 'Commons' is pretty ironic, too.

My constituents are my employers - if I let them down I should be accountable to them.

Climate change demands a collective response. We can't expect other countries to act if we don't.

Politicians can either keep listening to a small number of polluting fossil fuel companies, who're keen to profit from keeping us hooked on oil, coal and gas, or they can listen to the majority of other voices from civil society to business calling for an urgent switch to low and zero carbon heat and power.

Renewable energy is not unaffordable as the fossil fuel giants would like us to believe.

A public, unified and integrated railway - hardly controversial.

The point about Roosevelt's New Deal was that it was visionary - for the 1930s.

With pollution from traffic a major source of greenhouse gas emissions, we should be building a transport and planning system that makes car-free travel for shorter distances the norm for the majority.

Coronavirus has exposed for all what many of us already knew - some of our most important workers have barely enough to live on, and millions are condemned to financial insecurity, inequality and food poverty.

Other countries are developing well-being economies - we should do the same. That is the way to create a society which would stand the test of time - for everyone.

Humanity's inclination to be kind during the coronavirus crisis is an unprecedented, uplifting demonstration of solidarity.

The truth is that goodness is hardwired in humanity.

There is an important message that all political leaders should be taking from the response to coronavirus, and that is that people are prepared to make hard choices for the common good.

No more top-down politics with Westminster dictating what's right for every community. We must all be partners in designing a better future for our country.

Sometimes it takes a sudden change to make you realise just how bad things were.

Clear skies and clean air must become the new normal. We must re-design our cities, reclaiming the streets for cycling and walking, allowing people to walk along streets unpolluted by traffic.

We must not let the response to the coronavirus crisis make the climate and inequality crises even worse.

When this coronavirus crisis is over, what kind of society will we be? A more important question is what kind of society do we want to be?

It used to be said that war was the locomotive of history, with its power to accelerate change. The coronavirus crisis has that same power. It has already shown us who we really are, and how there is much more than unites than divides us. It has shown how governments need to work with their citizens to overcome threats or challenges.

The response to coronavirus has shown what can be done when governments put their mind to it.