Are not couturiers the poets who, from year to year, from strophe to strophe, write the anthem of the feminine body?

I live in my suffering and that makes me happy. Anything that keeps me from living in my suffering is unbearable to me.

Don’t bleach language, savour it instead. Stroke it gently or even groom it, but don’t “purify” it.

I am either lacerated or ill at ease and occasionally subject to gusts of life.

It must always be considered as though spoken by a character in a novel

Everyone is “extremely nice”—and yet I feel entirely alone. (“Abandonitis”).

As soon as someone dies, frenzied construction of the future (shifting furniture, etc.): futuromania.

I can't get to know you" means "I shall never know what you really think of me." I cannot decipher you because I do not know how you decipher me.

I ask for nothing but to live in my suffering.

The text you write must prove to me that it desires me.

There is nothing in discourse that is not to be found in a sentence.

Painting can feign reality without having seen it. Discourse combines signs which have referents, of course, but these referents can be and are most often 'chimeras.

Frontiers are physical as well as symbolic constructions

The pleasure of the text is that moment when my body pursues its own ideas—for my body does not have the same ideas as I do.

A creative writer is one for whom writing is a problem.

Literature is like phosphorus: it shines with its maximum brilliance and the moment when it attempts to die.

In the sentence “She’s no longer suffering,” to what, to whom does “she” refer? What does that present tense mean?

We know that to give writing its future, it is necessary to overthrow the myth: the birth of the reader must be at the cost of the death of the Author.

Isolation and competition are inhospitable to learning.

Incoherence seems to me preferable to a distorting order.

A photograph is always invisible, it is not it that we see.

...that ambiguous area of culture where something unfailingly political, though separate from the political choices of the day, infiltrates judgment and language.

It is my desire I desire, and the loved being is no more than its tool.

I pass lightly through the reactionary darkness.

What I hide by my language, my body utters.

I have a disease; I see language.

Above all, do not attempt to be exhaustive.

To see someone who does not see is the best way to be intensely aware of what he does not see.

The grim egoism (egotism) of mourning of suffering

Ci che reclamo vivere la piena contraddizione del mio tempo, che mai cos bene ha reso al sarcasmo la condizione della verit .

[T]he more technology develops the diffusion of information (and notably of images), the more it provides the means of masking the constructed meaning under the appearance of the given meaning.

Language is neither reactionary nor progressive; it is quite simply fascist; for fascism does not prevent speech, it compels speech.

What affects me most powerfully: mourning in layers—a kind of sclerosis. [Which means: no depth. Layers of surface—or rather, each layer: a totality. Units]

The cultural work done in the past by gods and epic sagas is now done by laundry-detergent commercials and comic-strip character

Engulfment is a moment of hypnosis.

Literature is that neuter, that composite, that oblique into which every subject escapes, the trap where all identity is lost, beginning with the very identity of the body that writes.

[T]he most repugnant bastard there is: the bastard-octopus.

Now take all the delights of the earth, melt them into one single delight, and cast it entire into a single man - all this will be as nothing to the delight of which I speak.

The author enters into his own death, writing begins.

Like man himself, who is the only one not to know his own glance, the [Eiffel] Tower is the only blind point f the total optical system of which it is the center and Paris the circumference.

To instil into the Established Order the complacent portrayal of its drawbacks has nowadays become a paradoxical but incontrovertible means of exalting it.

The (i)studium(i) is ultimately always coded, the (i)punctum is not)...

Afternoon with Michel, sorting maman’s belongings. Began the day by looking at her photographs. A cruel mourning begins again (but had never ended). To begin again without resting. Sisyphus.

Around 6 p.m.: the apartment is warm, clean, well-lit, pleasant. I make it that way, energetically, devotedly (enjoying it bitterly): henceforth and forever I am my own mother.

Today there is no symbolic compensation for old age, no recognition of a specific value: wisdom, perceptiveness, experience, vision.

—You have never known a Woman’s body! —I have known the body of my mother, sick and then dying.

My claim is to live to the full contradiction of my time

The key to change... is to let go of fear,

Well, the first year I lost my voice I didn't mind so much because I was going to have a baby and I was distracted with him anyway, I didn't even think about it that much, well, OK, this is what's happening.

And I kind of said to myself if I get my voice back I'm not going to take back the old anxiety about it and just focus on the limitations. I'm really going to enjoy it.